The ADL, Antisemitism, and the Silence on Gaza Starvation
When the definition of antisemitism becomes a political shield, the world loses sight of actual human suffering.
A Pattern of Overreach
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has long positioned itself as America’s premier watchdog against antisemitism. That mission matters. But in recent years, the organization has been criticized—internally and externally—for applying the term “antisemitism” so broadly that it sometimes sweeps up legitimate criticism of Israeli policy or pro-Palestinian advocacy.
Former staffers have raised alarms that this broad approach dilutes the ADL’s credibility.
Journalists and human rights observers argue that labeling dissent as “hate” can shut down legitimate debate about Israel and Palestine.
Critics warn this dynamic undermines humanitarian concern—by making advocacy for Palestinians sound suspect, even when it’s grounded in verifiable fact.
When antisemitism is redefined to mean “criticism of Israel,” it doesn’t just damage the ADL’s reputation—it distorts…
