Not sure what was expected by release of the investigative files but I never thought the president would have done anything that was illegal, despite his reputation. All people want to know is how many important individuals would be caught up in the intrigue. Names are redacted so we’ll never know. The only thing that this reaffirms is the president has always associated himself with less than stellar friends, and we should all be concerned with that. Of course, it’s not illegal but its not the type of individual we should want to lead the nation
Not sure what was expected by release of the investigative files but I never thought the president would have done anything that was illegal, despite his reputation. All people want to know is how many important individuals would be caught up in the intrigue. Names are redacted so we’ll never know. The only thing that this reaffirms is the president has always associated himself with less than stellar friends, and we should all be concerned with that. Of course, it’s not illegal but its not the type of individual we should want to lead the nation
How do you legally justify redacting names on a list people committing illegal activities completely outside of any government operation?
Not that I'm at all surprised but usually redacted things come from government documents not discovery in a criminal case